Saturday, February 15, 2025

naked lunch

I've been working on this performance art piece where I text pictures to a core group of friends and family (individually) to see what kind of text threads I can engender. It's a lot more fun and effective than just texting "What's up?" The pictures are primarily mundane images of views around my apartment, and so I call both the photo series and the performance piece naked lunch, stylized lowercase.

It all started when the management company for my apartment building cancelled a scheduled inspection, which was supposed to include checking the status of our appliances. After they cancelled, I took a picture of my lunch with my stove in the background. No reason. The composition just caught my eye. I texted it to a friend from high school just for grins. (It was only later that I thought maybe subconsciously I felt the need to show my appliances to somebody, anybody.)

My friend texted back, "What is this?" which could mean two things: what is the dish? and/or why are you sending me a picture of your lunch?

"I call it chicken casserole," I texted back, which also has a double meaning: the dish is chicken casserole, and the photo is "Chicken Casserole."


Click on images to enlarge them.

I then decided to text the image to my closest friends and family members. Most of them texted variations on "Whatcha cookin'?" Here's a good thread: 

She: Nice! What are you making?

Me: Chicken casserole!

She: Yum. I made a chicken dish this week, too. With broth, mushrooms, artichoke hearts, over gluten free pasta. Very tasty. Having leftovers for lunch today. What’s in your casserole?

Me: Chicken, cream of broccoli soup, some onions and quite a lot of pepper! [I left out egg noodles]

She: Cool. Cheese!

Me: No cheese.

She: When you make a casserole do you make it for one meal or do you have leftovers?

Me: Excellent questions! It makes 4 meals. [I reheat the other portions for lunch on subsequent days]

She: Excellent planning!

Me: I’m an experienced bachelor.

She: Haha 

[new text] I need a cook.

Me: I need a woman.

Another thread:

He: Whatcha making

Me: Chicken casserole!

He: Nice, I made pecan chicken the other day. Learned that you can add frozen veggies to the rice cooker halfway through - game changer!

Me: Gnice! 

[new text] Did that sound like Borat?

He: I haven’t seen that movie in 10 years+ and I can still hear it crystal clear in my head lol

Me: He owned it!

And: 

Another she: "Lotta cooking happening there? Cool photo!" 

I have always said that the best response you can get to an artwork is "Cool!" At least one person probably looked at the Parthenon and thought, "Cool." After a few more exchanges, this friend wrote, "It’s so cool. I’d love to see this in a collection. What would you call it and what other subjects/scenes would you choose?" Eventually I started calling it naked lunch.

A few days later, on Christmas Eve, I caught a glimpse of my shower in the dark down the hallway of my apartment and texted this picture out:

She: Hey!! Where am I?

Me: My apartment!

She: [sent a picture of her sister holding a dog standing in front of a Christmas tree] Oh cool!! Here’s -------- with new puppy --------!

Me: That is the best picture I have seen in a really long time!

This person eventually picked up on what I was doing and started sending me pictures from her own life.

One friend usually responded by providing captions for my pics:

She: The Hallway as Interpreted by the Academic and Musician. 

Another she: Not a creature was stirring

Me: Nice!

The day after Christmas I sent an image of the Christmas cards I had received:


She: It looks like an exhibit!

Me: The internet is the largest art gallery in the world!

She: But the word museum back there! What’s that?

Me: [misunderstanding what she meant] It’s similar to the way we click on a floppy disk icon to save a file.

She: [loved “It’s similar to the way we click on a floppy disk icon to save a file.”]

Me: [smiley face emoji]

Later in the thread, it dawned on me that she was referring to the words on the poster behind the Christmas cards.

Me: I was going back over this thread and I realized you were asking about the word “Museum” on the poster behind the Christmas cards. I thought you were commenting on my reference to the internet as the world’s largest art gallery.

She: Yes!!! The word museum!!!

Me: The poster is from a Jackson Pollock exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art. 

I like the way it says “The Museum of Mode” behind the cards.

She: [loved “I like the way it says ‘The Museum of Mode’ behind the cards.”]

Another she: [loved an image]

Beautiful! And I meant to tell you, my mother enjoyed reading your postcard folder as well

Me: omg, --------, that’s one of the nicest compliments I’ve ever received! [heart emoji]

She: [loved “omg, --------, that’s one of the nicest compliments I’ve ever received! [heart emoji]”]

Me: Give your folks my love. Happy Boxing Day!

She: To you as well! 

That same day after Christmas I had a friend over for tea and conversation. Before she arrived, I prepared a cutting board of cheese and crackers:


She (not the friend who was coming over): That cheese looks good. What kind?

Me: Smoked gouda!

She: I was going to guess that! Yum.

Me: It’s my go-to. 

With stoned wheat thins.

Another she: Oh yum!!! 

[she sent a picture of her sister pushing a cat in a fuchsia cat stroller] our joint Christmas present from mom!

Me: Now THERE’S a picture!

I should mention that most of these threads continued on about different things, many of them still active when the next picture came up. Also, throughout these texts I was sprinkling in self-portraits, to give people an idea of what I was looking like these days (and to show off my updated wardrobe!). The last one I sent I call "Dress Blues":


She: [loved an image]

Me: I’m going out tomorrow night and I was putting together my wardrobe.

She: Very handsome!!!!

Me: [toothy grin smiley face emoji]

He: What’s up?

Me: I’m going out tomorrow night and I was putting together my wardrobe.

He: On a date?

Me: No, to check out a band.

He: Alright. Looking good for that. Enjoy!

Me: [toothy grin smiley face emoji]

Another she: Looking sharp, there! Off to somewhere fun or new clothes?

Me: Both! I’m going out tomorrow night and I was putting together my wardrobe.

She: We both give a thumbs up!

Another she: Going out?

Me: Mañana!

She: Looking Dapper!

Me: [toothy grin smiley face emoji]

Yet another she: hey!! i know that guy!

Me: I’m going clubbing tomorrow night and I want to look cool.

She: i think you nailed it!

Me: [toothy grin smiley face emoji]

One last she: Oh very nice look!!!! [five gold stars emoji]

Me: I’m going out tonight and I was putting together my wardrobe.

She: Ya look like a handsome devil!

Me: [heart emoji] I’ve been working on it!

She: [loved “I’ve been working on it!”]

At this point, I thought this piece might be over. But then in January we got a couple of snowstorms, and I sent out pictures from that, including this one:



She: Clever shot! Rothko-like

Me: Yes!

Another she: [loved an image]

Snow in the shade

Me: Precisely!

Another she: Like it!

Me: [smiley face emoji]

Another she: [loved an image]

Love!!

Me: [smiley face emoji]

He: What made the tracks?

Me: Human!

One of my neighbors.

He: [thumbs up emoji]

Me: [peace sign emoji]

She: That picture is cool. 

Me: I have always said that the best response you can get to an artwork is "Cool!"

She: [loved "I have always said that the best response you can get to an artwork is 'Cool!'"]

Then I had the flu and was basically snowed in for a couple of weeks. When I finally started feeling better and the weather turned a little warmer, I left the door to my apartment open. I don't have a screen door, but there are no flies in the wintertime!


Me: Airing This Place Out

I don't usually give titles or captions to the pictures in this series, but I feared this one would be too random, even in a series of random photographs, and I wasn't sure how many people had picked up on the fact that this was a project, much less a work of performance art. 

She: Looks great! Love the light in the rug and the perfectly framed tree outside

Me: You're the first to comment on the tree! I put it there!

She: Oh, you mean you cut and pasted it?

That kind of gives it everything. You have your interior and your exterior. There's a tension between them because both of them look beckoning.

Me: No, I placed it there in the composition.

Thank you!

She: Oh well, I felt it was very intentional

Me: Yes, indeed.

She: And I like it even more knowing that that was already there. Which is what I presumed. Until you said you put it there, ha ha

Me: I was being overly clever.

She: Would you have called it art if you had cut and pasted it?

Me: Absolutely.

She: I don't think you were being overly clever. I think you were being observant and that's wise we care nothing for being clever. We have a good sense of humor but as artists we're looking for truth with a capital T.

Me: All man-made objects are works of art.

And, of course, scientists are looking for Truth, too.

She: I know you believe that and I tend to agree with you.

Everything we do is contrived as artists.

Me: It's complicated. [smiley face emoji]

She: But I find something particularly moving when it's already present in the world, and we simply reframe it without touching it. 

We just show people something with fresh eyes that has been there all along.

And when I say we, I am very lightly talking about my artistry. I am not taking myself as a serious art critic.

Me: Wordsworth said that.

She: [like "It's complicated."]

Me: Or Coleridge.

She: I gotta go back and read those guys, ha ha!

I know they were so into nature

Me: Me too!

She: And the sublime

I think it's our natural state, to feel connected to nature

Maybe that sounded dumb, because I said natural and then nature

Me: The idea of the "artist" showing the masses what is right in front of their eyes.

She: Yes!

Me: Although, I don't think they'd have used the word "masses."

She: Hordes

Hoi palloi

Me: I'm sure you still have your Norton Anthology of English Literature.

She: I have both volume one and volume two

Me: Lay people.

She: Probably, they thought of them as the great unwashed

I'm just joking around

Me: I lost my volume one somewhere along the way.

She: What a shame!

I'm sure you could pick it up at any secondhand online bookstore.

Me: Yeah, I was gonna say "rubes," but that doesn't sound like them, either.

omg, I live on eBay!

She: Rubes is a good one.

Me: And Thriftbooks.

She: I think it's funny how many people think hoi polloi means hoity-toity or fancy folk!

Me: I was just thinking that!

She: I guess HOI makes them think of hoity

Come to think of it I wonder where hoity toity comes from

Me: I mean, I was thinking, "Isn't hoi polloi fancy folk"!

Shows how much I know!

She: That's OK! I love learning new words

I learn new words almost every day on spelling bee on the New York Times because the words I can't get are usually words I have no idea existed

Like TENON

That was new to me the other day

Me: I'll bet you've heard "mortise and tenon," and "tenon" just looked odd all by itself.

And I texted her a picture of mortise and tenon work on a piece of furniture my dad made.

Me: From the dresser my dad made for me.

She: Oooo I love that!!!!! He was an artist!!!

Me: Stop it!

She: You don't think he was? or are you kidding? because that is master craftsmanship.

Me: It's complicated!

She: It goes beyond technical skill. You have to have the heart for this work.

I thought you said everything man-made was art

So when you said stop it, what did you really mean?

At this point I called her on the phone to talk about this in depth. Because it's complicated!

Another she: Yes! You're supposed to for the Lunar New Year for good fortune, wealth and health

Nice photo btw!

Me: I knew that! (not)

Thank you!

Another she: That's probably a good idea after your illness! [toothy grin smiley face emoji]

Me: Exactly!

Another she: Beautiful sunny day! I'm stuck in bed with a cold.

Me: Oh, shoot. I had the flu over the holidays. It was brutal.

He: Looking good!

Me: Feels good!

This project is all about working within the format to create an entirely new art form. I feel like the recipients of the photos should be able to sell them as NFTs, now that the (art) world knows they're part of an art piece. 

The next image in the series is actually a short video of me ironing a shirt that I posted on YouTube. If I'm honest, I must admit that I didn't realize it was part of the series until after I had finished it. But that's how art happens. You listen to the work and follow where it leads you. That's the beauty of it. I think it didn't occur to me that it was part of naked lunch at first because it wasn't sent via text. But it's definitely a mundane view into my apartment!

I sent the link to the group via email. I got a couple of comments and some long, thoughtful and often very opinionated email responses from other hard-core ironers, but there were few text threads because it didn't start out as a text. After a couple of days I tried to get text threads going by texting to some members of the group, "You've got to have something to say about my video!" 

This also has two meanings. The primary meaning is, "I know you thought my video was odd, but you must have some thoughts about it." The subtext is, "I'm working on this performance art piece, and you need to say something about my video to continue to contribute to the narrative."

Monday, February 10, 2025

folklore

This post originated as an email to my niece.

Hello, dear. I assume you have not commented on my blog post about The Tortured Poets Department because the ideas there are nothing you didn't know already, which is totally understandable. You're like, "Yeah, Uncle Ned, she's been doing that for years."

It is true that I am not as much of a Swift aficionado as most Swifties. I'm well-versed in the hits, the popular deep cuts, the notable live performances, but until recently the only album I had was 1989. I actually bought TTPD when it came out, but I only really listened to it over Christmas. And now I'm listening to folklore for the first time. Of course, it's brilliant. Won Album of the Year. She actually writes in the liner notes that she's writing in others' voices. "I found myself not only writing my own stories, but also writing about or from the perspective of people I've never met, people I've known, or those I wish I hadn't."

When I first heard "the last great american dynasty," I thought she was saying, "I had a marvelous time moving in everything," instead of "I had a marvelous time ruining everything."

One of the fun things about finally listening to this album is hearing the songs I've already heard in the context of the album and without commercial interruptions.

Hi to all! Hope y'all are doing well.

Much love,

Uncle Ned



Saturday, February 1, 2025

Museum postcards

A few years ago, I hit upon this idea of telling a story through a series of postcards. It all started with a series I sent to my nieces in December of 2021, telling the story (from my perspective) of a road trip my family had taken in the summer of 1976. Since then, I have sent over 400 postcards to friends and family, usually in dedicated series. Most of these series have either been about this photographer and postcard peddler from the postwar period whom I discovered named Ernest Ferguson or about Vincent van Gogh and my theory of The Starry Night

While I originally shopped for postcards at local indoor flea markets, I eventually moved to eBay. But there are a few Van Gogh postcards that I am always hoping to find on the auction site that unfortunately rarely if ever show up for sale. Finally, I got the bright idea to order the cards from the museums themselves. 

But museums don’t sell postcards online. I assume it’s just not worth it to them. So I decided to try a fun little experiment and send twenty dollars cash to various museums and see who would respond. (I should mention that when it comes to postcards of paintings, I’m a bit of a snob, or a purist, in that I only want the official postcards printed by the museums that own the works.) Obviously, sending cash in the mail is a bit of a crap shoot, but that’s part of the fun of it. And after all, it’s only twenty bucks.

First, on August 17, 2024, I sent requests to the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Indianapolis Museum of Art for two of my favorite paintings by Van Gogh, Rain and Landscape at Saint-Rémy (Enclosed Field with Peasant), respectively, the latter of which is integral to my Starry Night theory. Indy came in quickly, in less than two weeks. I didn’t hear from Philly.

I didn’t know how much museum postcards were going for these days. I figured twenty bucks would get me maybe five, allowing for shipping and handling. I got 15 postcards from Indianapolis! I had wanted the cards originally for any future Starry Night series I might send to people, but when I got fifteen, I decided to turn this into a sort of performance art piece and send them to my core group of friends and family who had been receiving postcard series over the past few years, nine in all. Here is the first card, front and back, with a transcript of the text I wrote, telling my friends about the project.



Click on images to enlarge them.


“Museums don’t sell postcards online. So I mailed a $20 bill to the Indianapolis Museum of Art and asked them to please send me as many postcards of this ptg. as 20 bucks would buy, minus postage. I figured with inflation they’d be, like, 3 dollars each and I’d get maybe 5. ¶ I got 15!”

On August 26, I sent a twenty dollar bill to the Cincinnati Art Museum for postcards of one of my all-time favorite Van Goghs, Undergrowth with Two Figures. They responded within two weeks as well. Here is the postcard and my text.




“I also sent the Cincinnati Art Museum 20 bucks for postcards of this painting, and they sent me 9! ¶ This is one of my all-time favorite ptgs. by Van Gogh. I’ve only ever seen it on regular (continental) sized postcards (with lots of white space top and bottom). But given its odd dimensions (50 x 100 cm; Vincent actually used this size a bunch in the last months of his life, in Auvers; before that his preferred size was 73 x 92) anyway, I’ve always felt that this wide format would lend itself perfectly to an oversized card, and obviously so did they! (It is slightly cropped top and bottom, hence ‘detail’.)”

I got the feeling that the people in the museum shops in the heartland cities of Indianapolis and Cincinnati were open to my project, while the hard-boiled east coast Philadelphians were, like, “Thanks for lunch, hayseed!” So, I sent Philadelphia another request, on September 11, saying that if they had already sent my previous request (which I was pretty sure they hadn’t) to just send me an assortment of other major works in their collection. A week later, I actually got the first batch I had requested, a month after the initial request. Given the postmark, they had obviously mailed these before they got my second request. They had just taken their time with the first request. Here's the postcard and my text.






“Obviously, I was taking a chance sending cash in the mail. Indy and Cincy responded promptly, within 2 weeks. But after 4 weeks I figured Philly had pocketed the cash, making an example of a naïve Southerner. ¶ A few days after I’d sent them another request with another $20 bill—offering them a 2d chance to do the right thing—the original request came in! 15 of these cards! ¶ Maybe they had been temporarily out.”

A couple of weeks later I got the assortment of highlights from Philly and mailed these individually to the group, based on their personalities. 

This was August and September. In October, I initiated a Phase Two of the project. I started by sending a twenty to the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA), requesting the postcard of their prize Rothko, which was the first in my Regarding series of “art” photographs. (I actually mailed this request on September 30.) Then, on October 8, I sent a third request to Philly for a selection from the highlights they had previously sent. Since I now knew how much the postcards and the shipping costs were (they had sent receipts with the previous batches), I mailed them a check this time, figuring they couldn’t pocket this. Nothing! And according to my bank statements, they haven’t cashed the check.

Also on the eighth, I sent a twenty to the Museum of Modern Art in New York (MoMA), asking for the postcard of another painting in the Regarding series, Jackson Pollock’s One. A week later, I sent another twenty to MoMA for The Starry Night. On that same day I sent a twenty to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, for Van Gogh’s Irises

The Met sent the cash back with a note saying that they could not fulfil an order in this manner. I briefly thought about writing them back and telling them that their wholesome counterparts in the Midwest had fulfilled my request, even the cretins in Philadelphia had, and that in the time that it took them to send me the note they could have fulfilled the order. But I thought better of it.

Otherwise, I didn’t hear from any of the others! If these had been the first museums I had written to, in Phase One, this project probably would have never happened. 

Over a month after I sent the first MoMA requests, I did the same thing I had done with Philly, sending another twenty asking for The Starry Night again and saying that if they had already fulfilled my previous requests to just send me an assortment of their greatest hits. This was on November 23, and then, on December 14, I received the first two orders! Which means that this time, unlike Philly, they probably got my third request before they finally mailed the first two. I imagine a different associate or a manager at the MoMA Store opening this third request and asking the staff what previous requests I was referring to—and the culprit secretly going back and filling those requests.

The first two orders, you will recall, were for The Starry Night and Pollock’s One, and they fulfilled them together. Unfortunately, MoMA’s postcard prices are higher than the other museums (some of which gave me a volume discount) and so I only received nine of each of these postcards, and there are nine people on my mailing list for this project, which meant that there would be no cards left over for me, especially The Starry Night. So, some people got The Starry Night and some people got the Pollock, which kind of worked out because some people had already gotten a Starry Night postcard from me in the past.



They even gave me change!

"MoMA finally came in! But only after I mailed them a third request—two months after the first two! ¶ I think I sent them on a guilt trip!" At the bottom of the Pollock cards I wrote, "This is the painting in the Regarding series." At the bottom of the Starry Night cards, I wrote, "The brightest 'star' is actually Venus.©" This phrase is actually not copyrighted, but it is one of my taglines and it should be.

Oddly, I have never received the third MoMA request. And I’m still waiting for the third Philly request.

Miraculously, on Christmas Eve, I finally received the Rothko cards from SFMOMA, three months after the original request!






"I sent 20 bucks to SFMOMA on Sept. 30, and they came in on Christmas Eve! ¶ This is the first painting in the Regarding series."